Quantcast

Robbing Taxpayers to Pay the Bondsman

by Emily Washington on January 26, 2010

in Crime

While the bail bondsmen’s lobby generally receives little attention, they are using political clout to further their interests at great expense to taxpayers across the country.

Advances in GPS technology have allowed judges the option to release non-violent suspected criminals before their trials, wearing ankle bracelets to keep track of their whereabouts. Pretrial release programs can save localities millions of dollars annually compared to the cost of holding suspects in prison. Pretrial release also allows citizens to continue with their daily routines while they await trial and often prevents personal financial hardship as a result.

NPR’s Laura Sullivan reports:

It wasn’t just the money that made the program valuable. Three years ago, the Broward County jail was so full, a judge called the conditions unconstitutional.

Instead of building a new $70 million jail as they had proposed, county commissioners voted to expand pretrial release, letting more inmates out on supervised release. Within a year, the jail population plunged, so much so that the sheriff closed an entire wing. It saved taxpayers $20 million a year.

However, the program in Broward County, Florida was severely cut back after the bondsmen’s lobby pressured the commissioners to protect their profits:

According to campaign records… bondsmen spread almost $23,000 across the council in the year before the bill was passed. Fifteen bondsmen cut checks worth more than $5,000 to commissioner and now-county Mayor Ken Keechl just five days before the vote.

Aside from the expense to taxpayers that holding suspects before their trials imposes, another NPR story in the same series explains that releasing inmates on bail disadvantages low-income prisoners:

People with money get out. They go back to their jobs and their families, pay their bills and fight their cases. And according to the Justice Department and national studies, those with money face far fewer consequences for their crimes.

People without money stay in jail and are left to take whatever offer prosecutors feel like giving them.

Related posts

View Comments    Share Share    Print Print    Email Email

  • johnnevil
    You are way off base with your ideas. I am a Bondsman in Georgia. I have seen pretrail release you front. You are still releasing people yes, but you are not securing their return to court as with a bonding company as surety. The bondsman make sure that the person returns to court. If they don't the bondsman locates and returns the person to custody sometimes even from out of state. The county will not return the person from within the same state alone from other states. If the bonding returns the person the jail it costs the county nothing for this service. Pre-trail starts out harmless at first with just small charges as traffic but before you know it becomes a monster where they are releasing worse criminals. The county makes money by charging the people usually the same amount as the bonding charges but they have no one responsible for the person. You end up putting a bigger burden on the Counties Sheriff department who is already burdened by an over load of unserved warrants. People seem to come to court more often when they have a loved one or a friend responsible for their appearance to Court. There are tons of reports by news agencies telling of the cost from the Person failing to appear to court and also the difference have the Government release program and the cost of private bonding. Bottom line pre-trail release does not have a personal interest in someone showing up for court, They answer to no one if the person doesn't show up for Court. If you are the victim, how would you feel if the person who took advantage of you never had to answer the charges. Private bonding companies are responsible for that person to show up and the private bonding get punished if they don't. Knowing that which is the the best choice to have that person released from jail to actually show up?

    GPS only keep honest people honest. There is a case where someone was released on a GPS ankle monitor, the person wrapped something around the unit to stop the signal and then went across town and commited a murder and then went back to his residence and unwrapped the unit. The unit didn't show the offender had left his residence. Lucky there was witnesses to this horrible crime and he is being charged with this crime. People can cut these unit off at any time and then you have to wait until a judge is available to issue a warrant for this person which can be as long as 18 hours or longer. The bondsman can pick up someone right away for cutting off their monitor as a violation of their bond. Which do you think has a better chance of catching the person, someone who can do it right away or someone after an 18 + hour head start?
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: